What Local Officials Need to Know about the Recent U.S. Supreme Court Voting Rights Act Decision

What Local Officials Need to Know about the Recent U.S. Supreme Court Voting Rights Act Decision

Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is the federal law that has most directly shaped how local governments draw their district maps and structure their elections. It is a permanent, nationwide prohibition on any voting standard, practice, or procedure that results in the denial or abridgment of the right of any citizen to vote on account of race, color, or membership in a language minority group. The Act applies to every level of government, including county commissions, city councils, school boards, and judicial districts. In practice, the law has been most often invoked at the local level.…
Read More
South Carolina Governor Calls Special Session on Redistricting After Senate Blocks Extension

South Carolina Governor Calls Special Session on Redistricting After Senate Blocks Extension

South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster called a special session Thursday evening for state lawmakers to tackle redistricting ahead of the midterm elections, announcing on X: "I have issued an Executive Order calling the General Assembly back for an extra legislative session to address the state budget and congressional districts." The session is set to begin on Friday morning. McMaster initially chose not to set a special session but changed course after the Republican-led state Senate rejected a measure to extend its current session to take up a redrawn map, despite pressure from President Donald Trump, who posted on Truth Social,…
Read More
Georgia Governor Calls for June Special Session for Mid-Decade Redistricting

Georgia Governor Calls for June Special Session for Mid-Decade Redistricting

Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp has called the General Assembly into a special session beginning June 17 to consider new congressional, state Senate, and state House district maps for the 2028 election cycle, according to the governor’s May 13 proclamation. The session is being called in response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s April 29 decision in Louisiana v. Callais, which affected how race may be considered in redistricting. The proposed maps are not expected to govern this year’s midterm elections because the proclamation specifies the 2028 cycle. Kemp noted that it was too late to change the maps before the upcoming…
Read More
What Is a Shapefile and Why Do You Need One for Redistricting?

What Is a Shapefile and Why Do You Need One for Redistricting?

If you have spent any time around redistricting software or GIS professionals, you have probably heard the term "shapefile" and possibly nodded along without knowing what it means. A shapefile is a digital file format that stores the geographic boundaries of a defined area as a map layer. Think of it as the outline of a jurisdiction, your city limits, your county boundaries, your voting precincts, your census tracts, all saved in a format that mapping software can read, display, and analyze. TIGER boundary files are shapefiles from the Census Bureau that are important for drawing legally compliant district maps.…
Read More
Missouri State Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in 3 Challenges to 2025 Congressional Map

Missouri State Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in 3 Challenges to 2025 Congressional Map

The Missouri Supreme Court heard oral arguments Tuesday morning in three consolidated challenges to the state's new congressional map, known as the Missouri First Map, which Gov. Mike Kehoe signed into law following a special legislative session in September 2025. The map, drawn as part of President Trump's broader mid-decade redistricting push to secure additional Republican congressional seats ahead of the 2026 midterms, splits parts of Kansas City into three districts and adds Republican-leaning areas to the district of Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, one of the state's two Democratic House members. The Republican-led legislature passed the map last fall, targeting one…
Read More
With Election Clock Ticking, Virginia Democrats File Emergency SCOTUS Appeal

With Election Clock Ticking, Virginia Democrats File Emergency SCOTUS Appeal

Virginia Democrats on Monday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to revive the voter-approved redistricting amendment struck down last week by the Supreme Court of Virginia, escalating the fight over the state's congressional map to the nation's highest court. In an emergency application filed with Chief Justice John Roberts, attorneys representing House Speaker Don Scott, Senate Majority Leader Scott Surovell, Senate President Pro Tempore Louise Lucas, and the commonwealth of Virginia asked the court to pause the state ruling while the appeal moves forward. Democrats are asking the court to immediately freeze the Virginia ruling and keep the new congressional maps…
Read More
U.S. Supreme Court Clears Alabama to “Revert” to Previously Struck Down 2023 Congressional Map

U.S. Supreme Court Clears Alabama to “Revert” to Previously Struck Down 2023 Congressional Map

In a 6-3 decision on Monday, the Supreme Court lifted lower-court injunctions that had blocked Alabama's 2023 congressional maps and imposed court-drawn maps set to remain in place until after the 2030 Census. The unsigned majority order offered no explanation, instead vacating the lower court ruling and remanding the case back to the three-judge district court for reconsideration in light of Louisiana v. Callais. The decision opens a path for Republicans to pick up an additional U.S. House seat, as the 2023 map cuts two majority-Black congressional districts down to one, concentrating Black voters into the 7th Congressional District while…
Read More
Tennessee Enacts New Congressional Map, Eliminating State’s Only Majority-Black District

Tennessee Enacts New Congressional Map, Eliminating State’s Only Majority-Black District

Last week's Supreme Court ruling in Louisiana v. Callais dramatically altered the legal landscape for redistricting across the South, and Tennessee wasted no time responding. In a 6-3 decision, the Court struck down Louisiana's majority-Black congressional district as an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, substantially narrowing the scope of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act for challenging district maps. Critically, the Court raised the evidentiary bar for plaintiffs, requiring them to prove discriminatory intent tied to present-day conditions and to offer alternative maps that also satisfy a state's legitimate redistricting goals, making it significantly harder to bring successful Voting Rights Act…
Read More
Virginia Supreme Court Strikes Down Democratic Redistricting Plan in McDougle v. Virginia

Virginia Supreme Court Strikes Down Democratic Redistricting Plan in McDougle v. Virginia

The Supreme Court of Virginia on May 8th, struck down a voter-approved constitutional amendment that would have authorized Democrats to redraw the state's congressional map mid-decade, voiding the results of the April 21 special election in which Virginia voters had narrowly approved the measure. In a 4-3 decision in McDougle v. Virginia, the court ruled that the General Assembly violated procedural requirements under Article XII, Section 1 of the Virginia Constitution by advancing the amendment to the ballot, declaring that the constitutional violation "incurably taints the resulting referendum vote and nullifies its legal efficacy." The core procedural flaw, as the…
Read More
Supreme Court Rewrites the Rules for Minority Voting Rights in Louisiana v. Callais

Supreme Court Rewrites the Rules for Minority Voting Rights in Louisiana v. Callais

On April 29, the Supreme Court issued a landmark 6-3 ruling in Louisiana v. Callais that dramatically narrows how courts evaluate claims of racial vote dilution under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA). The decision, written by Justice Alito, involves Louisiana's congressional map known as "SB8," which was drawn to include a second majority-Black district after a lower court found the state's earlier map likely violated the VRA. When Louisiana complied by drawing SB8, a separate group of plaintiffs challenged it as an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. The Supreme Court agreed, and in doing so, it reshaped the legal…
Read More