South Carolina Mid-Decade Redistricting Is Dead. For Now

South Carolina Mid-Decade Redistricting Is Dead. For Now

The Republican-led South Carolina Senate voted Tuesday against advancing a new congressional map, ending the redistricting effort in the state for now. Twelve Republicans joined with Senate Democrats to vote for a motion to kill the legislative effort to redraw South Carolina's seven congressional districts. The vote was 20-24 against a motion to force a final vote on the bill/map. The high-profile push came to an abrupt end as South Carolina state senators adjourned the special session, backing away from changes to district lines amid surging early voting across the state. Lawmakers spent roughly three hours at the State House…
Read More
South Carolina Governor Calls Special Session on Redistricting After Senate Blocks Extension

South Carolina Governor Calls Special Session on Redistricting After Senate Blocks Extension

South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster called a special session Thursday evening for state lawmakers to tackle redistricting ahead of the midterm elections, announcing on X: "I have issued an Executive Order calling the General Assembly back for an extra legislative session to address the state budget and congressional districts." The session is set to begin on Friday morning. McMaster initially chose not to set a special session but changed course after the Republican-led state Senate rejected a measure to extend its current session to take up a redrawn map, despite pressure from President Donald Trump, who posted on Truth Social,…
Read More

ACLU and League of Women Voters Take South Carolina’s Partisan Gerrymandering Fight to State Supreme Court

This Tuesday, June 24, 2025, the South Carolina Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in League of Women Voters of South Carolina v. Alexander, a landmark case brought by the ACLU, ACLU-SC, and League of Women Voters. Filed in July 2024, the lawsuit challenges the constitutionality of the state’s 2022 congressional map, which plaintiffs argue was drawn with the express aim of strengthening the Republican majority in the First Congressional District. They contend this map intentionally shifts Democratic-leaning populations, particularly Black voters, out of the district, violating Article 1, Section 5 of the South Carolina Constitution, which guarantees "free and open" elections…
Read More
Civil Rights Organizations File Amicus Brief in South Carolina Racial Gerrymandering Case

Civil Rights Organizations File Amicus Brief in South Carolina Racial Gerrymandering Case

Aug. 18 2023 League of Women Voters Press Release: WASHINGTON, DC — Today, the League of Women Voters of the United States joined an amicus brief filed by the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law in Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, a racial gerrymandering case to be heard before the Supreme Court of the United States this fall. The brief is also joined by the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, the Leadership Conference Education Fund, Asian Americans Advancing Justice | AAJC, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, Campaign Legal Center, Demos, and…
Read More
Litigation Update for South Carolina Redistricting (March 2023)

Litigation Update for South Carolina Redistricting (March 2023)

Litigation began in earnest in October of 2021 as the South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP anticipated the legislature's failure to draw valid lines. To compel the timely redrawing of district lines, the conference filed a lawsuit in federal district court. These lawsuits - often called "malapportionment" lawsuits - contend that a map violates the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution because the population totals of the various districts are out of proportion. However, the legislature passed the state senate and state house maps in December 2021 and the governor signed a congressional map in January 2022. The NAACP…
Read More
Redistricting Headlines Jan 31 2022: 3 States Finalize Maps and Big Litigation News in 2 States.

Redistricting Headlines Jan 31 2022: 3 States Finalize Maps and Big Litigation News in 2 States.

Last week in redistricting three states adopted maps, one state court made a decision about maps, and another court case may be heading to the nation's highest court. Map Enactments Three states enacted maps last week. On Wednesday, Jan. 26, the South Carolina legislature adopted and Gov. Henry McMaster signed a new congressional map into law. The state's legislative district map was enacted in December of last year. Maryland finalized its state legislative map on Thursday Jan. 27. The map was enacted as a joint resolution and does not require the governor's signature. Maryland's new congressional districts were adopted in a…
Read More

New South Carolina House Districts Challenged in U.S. District Court

The ACLU of South Carolina issued this press release (below) on Dec. 24, after filing an amended complaint with the U.S. District Court in Columbia, S.C. the day before. The case is NAACP v. McMaster. The original complaint asked the court to take jurisdiction over redistricting maps in SC in anticipation that the legislature would not complete maps in time for upcoming elections. However, the legislature passed, and the governor enacted a new state legislative district map on Dec 10. The amended complaint addresses the house district map specifically and reserves the right to challenge the senate map in the…
Read More

16 States Join in Alabama’s Challenge to the Census Bureau’s Data Privacy Program

On Monday, 16 states joined Alabama in deriding the U.S. Census Bureau's newly adapted data privacy policy (aka differential privacy) which uses statistical algorithms to distort raw census data before it is released to states and the public. The states who jointly filed as amici in Alabama's lawsuit against the Bureau are Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, West Virginia, and Utah. The amicus brief filed on behalf of these states lists three "major harms" caused by differential privacy. 1) local redistricting cannot be conducted with any reasonable accuracy; 2)…
Read More
South Carolina: Review of Litigation in the 2010 Redistricting Cycle

South Carolina: Review of Litigation in the 2010 Redistricting Cycle

South Carolina was involved in one major challenge to its congressional and state legislative maps adopted after the 2010 census. A federal trial court declined to invalidate the maps despite the plaintiff's claims of racial gerrymandering and Voting Rights Act (VRA) violations. Interestingly, the trial court's decision came shortly before the Supreme Court's decision in Shelby County, which drastically changed how racial considerations are viewed by courts under Section 5 of the VRA. Backus v. South Carolina, No. 3:11-cv-3120 (D.S.C. Mar. 9, 2012), aff’d, No. 11-1404 (U.S. Oct. 1, 2012) (mem.) Registered voters in South Carolina challenged the General Assembly’s state and congressional redistricting plans…
Read More