Redistricting Litigation

Florida Supreme Court Declines to Intervene, Locking in Mid-Decade Map for 2026

By EditorJun 14, 20260 Comments

The Florida Supreme Court ruled 6-1 on Wednesday, June 10, that it lacks jurisdiction to intervene while the redistricting lawsuit is still pending before the First District Court of Appeal, and declined to use its "all writs" power to grant a temporary injunction against using the mid-decade congressional map that the Florida legislature passed in April that could shift the state’s delegation from a 20–8 Republican advantage to a potential 24–4 split. The ruling came after plaintiffs, the Equal Ground Education Fund, represented by the Elias Law Group, had filed a motion on May 28 to bypass the First District Court…

Florida, Redistricting LitigationFlorida, lawindepth, mid-decade redistricting

Supreme Court’s Emergency Order Restores Alabama’s 2023 Congressional Map

By EditorJun 04, 20260 Comments

The Supreme Court on Tuesday night allowed Alabama to use a congressional map favoring Republicans in this year's elections, blocking a lower court ruling that the map intentionally discriminates against Black voters. The justices granted the state's emergency appeal to use a map it adopted in 2023 that has a majority-Black population in just one of its seven congressional districts. The three liberal justices dissented. The ruling takes effect immediately, meaning Alabama will use its 2023 map for its August 11 special primary elections covering the affected congressional districts. Unlike many shadow docket orders, the majority provided some explanation in…

Redistricting LitigationAlabama, caseupdates, Latest, mid-decade redistricting

SCOTUS Denies Emergency Request to Block California Map Over Racial Gerrymandering Claims

By EditorFeb 04, 2026

The U.S. Supreme Court has cleared the way for California to implement a new congressional map for the upcoming midterm elections, denying an emergency request from state Republicans to block its use. Enacted through the voter-approved Proposition 50, which passed by a two-to-one margin in November, the plan is projected to help Democrats secure five additional seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. Although the California GOP and the Trump administration argued the map was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, a lower federal court previously ruled that the evidence of racial motivation was "exceptionally weak" compared to the "overwhelming" evidence of…

California, Case UpdatesCalifornia, mid-decade redistricting, Prop 50

Virginia Mid-Decade Redistricting Update

By EditorFeb 01, 2026

Virginia’s mid-decade congressional map effort was halted by a Tazewell County circuit judge who said lawmakers didn’t follow the basic procedural rules for putting a constitutional amendment on the ballot. The state legislature's bid to install a new congressional map by constitutional amendment advanced in late October when the General Assembly, meeting in special session, approved a measure to permit enactment of a mid-decade redistricting congressional map effective for the 2026 mid-term election. A second passage was required in the 2026 session before the map could go to a voter referendum, which was completed on January 16. Republicans in Virginia…

Case Updateslawindepth, mid-decade redistricting, Virginia

Supreme Court Greenlights Texas Congressional Map for 2026

By EditorDec 06, 2025

Texas may use its new congressional plan for the 2026 elections after the Supreme Court granted the state’s emergency stay on Thursday, Dec. 4. In a short, unsigned order, the Court paused a three-judge district court’s Nov. 18 injunction that had barred the 2025 map and directed Texas back to its 2021 lines. Justice Samuel Alito had entered an administrative stay on Nov. 21 while the Court considered the application. The 5-paragraph order says Texas is likely to succeed because the lower court failed to presume legislative good faith and did not draw an adverse inference from the challengers’ failure…

Case Updates, Redistricting LitigationLatest, lawindepth, mid-decade redistricting, Texas, texas redistricting

The Court’s Second Look: Inside the October 15 Oral Argument in Louisiana v. Callais

By EditorOct 18, 2025

The Supreme Court reheard Louisiana v. Callais on Oct. 15, focusing on whether Louisiana’s intentional creation of a second majority-Black congressional district violates the Fourteenth or Fifteenth Amendments. Louisiana enacted SB 8 in 2024, creating a second majority-Black district after a trial court issued a preliminary injunction blocking the legislature's 2022 congressional map, which consisted of one majority Black district. A three-judge court in the Western District of Louisiana preliminarily enjoined the court-ordered 2024 remedial map on April 30, 2024, as an unconstitutional racial gerrymander after voters sued. The State and intervenor-appellants took a direct appeal to the Supreme Court,…

Case Updates, LAWLatest, lawindepth, louisiana, News

Utah Court Throws Out Congressional Map, Orders Redraw

By EditorAug 26, 2025

Utah’s redistricting fight reached a turning point on Monday, when Third District Court Judge Dianna Gibson ruled that lawmakers unconstitutionally repealed the voter‑approved Proposition 4 and ordered the Legislature to enact a remedial congressional map for the 2026 cycle. Proposition 4 passed narrowly by voters in 2018 and was branded “Better Boundaries.” Prop 4 created a seven-member independent redistricting commission and required maps to meet neutral criteria, including equal population, compactness/contiguity, maintaining cities and counties together, respecting communities of interest, and forbidding the drawing of districts to favor or disfavor a party or incumbent unduly. The Legislature could enact or…

Case Updates, State Laws, Utahcaseupdates, Latest, policyindepth, redistricting commissions, Utah

Texas Redistricting Update: July 2025

By EditorJul 29, 2025

Governor Greg Abbott convened a 30-day special legislative session on July 21, instructing lawmakers to redraw the state’s 38 U.S. House districts. The call follows a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) stating that four districts anchored in Houston and Fort Worth were "coalition districts," and may have been drawn “along strict racial lines,” (a.k.a racial gerrymanders), potentially violating the 14th Amendment. Lawmakers now have until roughly mid-August to craft new boundaries that satisfy equal-population and federal law requirements. Ongoing litigation over the 2021 mapsWhile legislators work on new boundaries, a three-judge federal panel in El Paso is…

Enacting a Redistricting Map, Redistricting Litigation, Texasmid-decade redistricting, racial gerrymandering, Texas, texas redistricting, Voting Rights Act

Eighth Circuit Leaves North Dakota Tribes and Section 2 enforcement, waiting on the Supreme Court

By EditorJul 08, 2025

This week, a divided Eighth Circuit has refused to rehear Spirit Lake Tribe v. Howe, leaving intact its May 2025 ruling that bars private plaintiffs from suing under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA). The order preserves a decision that eliminated a key enforcement pathway for the seven states within the circuit and sets the stage for potential U.S. Supreme Court involvement. The case began when the Spirit Lake Tribe and the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians challenged North Dakota’s 2021 legislative map, arguing that splitting their reservations diluted Native voting power. A U.S. District Court Judge…

Case Updates, Voting Rights ActNews, North Dakota

Georgia Redistricting Update (Jan. 10, 2024)

By EditorJan 10, 2024

On October 26, 2023, a U.S. District Court ordered Georgia's legislative and congressional districts to be redrawn before the 2024 election. The legislature had passed those maps in 2021 following the 2020 census. The litigation includes three sets of plaintiffs and the court ultimately found that the legislature's maps violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Among other findings, the court noted convincing evidence that the political process in Georgia was not equally accessible to Black voters when compared to their White counterparts. This being the case, the prophylactic measures prescribed in Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act were necessary…

Case Updates, HOME, LATEST, LAW, Race in Redistricting, Redistricting, Redistricting Litigation, Redistricting Race Rules, Voting Rights ActGeorgia, STATENEWS