Supreme Court Rewrites the Rules for Minority Voting Rights in Louisiana v. Callais

Supreme Court Rewrites the Rules for Minority Voting Rights in Louisiana v. Callais

By EditorMay 08, 20260 Comments
On April 29, the Supreme Court issued a landmark 6-3 ruling in Louisiana v. Callais that dramatically narrows how courts evaluate claims of racial vote dilution under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA). The decision, written by Justice Alito, involves Louisiana's congressional map known as "SB8," which was drawn to include a second majority-Black district after a lower court found the state's earlier map likely violated the VRA. When Louisiana complied by drawing SB8, a separate group of plaintiffs challenged it as an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. The Supreme Court agreed, and in doing so, it reshaped the legal…
Voting Rights Act, , , , ,
Read More
What Just Happened? Callais Decision Triggers Mutliple Map Redraws

What Just Happened? Callais Decision Triggers Mutliple Map Redraws

By EditorMay 07, 20260 Comments
The Supreme Court has struck down Louisiana’s 2024 congressional map in Louisiana v. Callais, ruling 6-3 that the state’s creation of a second majority-Black district was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. The map had been drawn after lower courts found Louisiana’s 2022 plan likely violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act because it contained only one majority-Black district in a state where Black residents make up roughly one-third of the population. But the new 2024 map prompted a separate challenge from voters who argued that Louisiana had sorted voters by race in violation of the Equal Protection Clause. The Court…
Louisiana, Voting Rights Act, , , , , , ,
Read More
New York’s 11th District Struck Down Over Racial Voting Power Concerns

New York’s 11th District Struck Down Over Racial Voting Power Concerns

By EditorFeb 03, 2026
State Supreme Court Justice Jeffrey Pearlman has invalidated the boundaries of New York’s 11th Congressional District, the city's only Republican-held seat currently represented by Nicole Malliotakis. The ruling determined that the district's current lines unconstitutionally diluted the voting power of Black and Hispanic residents in Staten Island and southern Brooklyn. Citing evidence of a "racially polarized voting bloc" and historical discrimination, the judge ordered the bipartisan Independent Redistricting Commission to submit a new map by February 6. While the commission holds primary authority, past failures to reach consensus have allowed the Democrat-controlled state legislature to intervene and adjust the lines…
New York, State Laws, , ,
Read More
Court Declines Preliminary Injunction Motion against California’s Prop 50 Congressional Map

Court Declines Preliminary Injunction Motion against California’s Prop 50 Congressional Map

By EditorJan 15, 2026
A 3-judge federal court panel has declined to issue a preliminary injunction preventing the use of California's new congressional map in the 2026 elections, which was approved by 64% of voters via Proposition 50 in a November special election. The legal challenge, brought by the California Republican Party and the U.S. Department of Justice, alleged that the map constituted racial gerrymandering by disproportionately favoring Latino voting power. After a three-day preliminary injunction hearing, however, the court rejected these claims in a 2-1 ruling, with the majority opinion concluding that the map was a "political gerrymander" rather than a racially motivated…
LAW, , ,
Read More
Utah Judge Chooses League of Women Voters’ Congressional Map, Rejects Legislature’s Plan

Utah Judge Chooses League of Women Voters’ Congressional Map, Rejects Legislature’s Plan

By EditorNov 14, 2025
A Utah trial court has selected a new congressional plan for the 2026 cycle, rejecting the Legislature’s October “Map C” and adopting the map offered by plaintiffs; the League of Women Voters of Utah and Mormon Women for Ethical Government.” In a 90-page ruling issued just before the court’s November 10 deadline, Third District Judge Dianna M. Gibson found Map C to be an “extreme partisan outlier” drawn to favor Republicans and held that it failed to comply with the neutral criteria required by Utah’s voter-approved Proposition 4. Judge Gibson ordered Plaintiffs’ Map 1 (see below) to take effect in…
State Laws, Utah, ,
Read More
A New Lawsuit is Filed Against New York’s Congressional Map

A New Lawsuit is Filed Against New York’s Congressional Map

By EditorNov 05, 2025
A new state-court lawsuit filed on October 27 challenges New York’s existing congressional map and specifically targets New York’s 11th District, the city’s lone GOP-held seat covering Staten Island and parts of southern Brooklyn. Four voters, represented by the Elias Law Group, allege the district’s current configuration unlawfully dilutes the voting power of Black and Latino residents in violation of New York law, and ask the court to redraw the lines before 2026. The case names the New York State Board of Elections as defendant and was filed in the Manhattan Supreme Court. The plaintiffs point to racially polarized voting…
LAW, New York,
Read More
The Court’s Second Look: Inside the October 15 Oral Argument in Louisiana v. Callais

The Court’s Second Look: Inside the October 15 Oral Argument in Louisiana v. Callais

By EditorOct 18, 2025
The Supreme Court reheard Louisiana v. Callais on Oct. 15, focusing on whether Louisiana’s intentional creation of a second majority-Black congressional district violates the Fourteenth or Fifteenth Amendments. Louisiana enacted SB 8 in 2024, creating a second majority-Black district after a trial court issued a preliminary injunction blocking the legislature's 2022 congressional map, which consisted of one majority Black district. A three-judge court in the Western District of Louisiana preliminarily enjoined the court-ordered 2024 remedial map on April 30, 2024, as an unconstitutional racial gerrymander after voters sued. The State and intervenor-appellants took a direct appeal to the Supreme Court,…
Case Updates, LAW, , ,
Read More
New GOP Lawsuit Targets Differential Privacy and Group Quarters Imputation, Claiming Flawed 2020 Census Data

New GOP Lawsuit Targets Differential Privacy and Group Quarters Imputation, Claiming Flawed 2020 Census Data

By EditorOct 11, 2025
A federal lawsuit challenging the underlying data of the 2020 U.S. Census has been filed in a Florida federal court by two young Republican organizations. The plaintiffs in this case, with potential national implications, are the University of South Florida College Republicans and its President, Michael Fusella, individually, along with the Pinellas County Young Republicans and its President, Parisa Mousavi, individually. The addresses associated with these plaintiffs fall within Florida's 14th Congressional District (represented by a Democrat) and the 15th Congressional District (represented by a Republican). The suit names the federal officials responsible for the data collection as defendants: Howard…
Census Data and Geography, Census Law, , , , , ,
Read More
Utah Court Throws Out Congressional Map, Orders Redraw

Utah Court Throws Out Congressional Map, Orders Redraw

By EditorAug 26, 2025
Utah’s redistricting fight reached a turning point on Monday, when Third District Court Judge Dianna Gibson ruled that lawmakers unconstitutionally repealed the voter‑approved Proposition 4 and ordered the Legislature to enact a remedial congressional map for the 2026 cycle. Proposition 4 passed narrowly by voters in 2018 and was branded “Better Boundaries.” Prop 4 created a seven-member independent redistricting commission and required maps to meet neutral criteria, including equal population, compactness/contiguity, maintaining cities and counties together, respecting communities of interest, and forbidding the drawing of districts to favor or disfavor a party or incumbent unduly. The Legislature could enact or…
Case Updates, State Laws, Utah, , , ,
Read More
Walking the Tightrope: How Courts Balance Minority Vote Dilution Rules and Racial Gerrymandering Limits

Walking the Tightrope: How Courts Balance Minority Vote Dilution Rules and Racial Gerrymandering Limits

By EditorAug 25, 2025
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act versus the 14th Amendment Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) prohibits any redistricting plan that dilutes the voting power of minorities. Since Thornburg v. Gingles (1986), plaintiffs preliminarily meet that standard by proving three conditions: the minority group must be large and compact enough to form a district, it must vote cohesively, and the white majority must usually defeat the minority’s candidate of choice. When those “Gingles preconditions” are satisfied, federal courts often order the state to draw an additional majority-minority district. The Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, however, takes a…
Racial Gerrymandering, Voting Rights Act, ,
Read More