Virginia’s On Again, Off Again Redistricting Map Referendum

Virginia’s On Again, Off Again Redistricting Map Referendum

On Feb. 19, 2026, Chief Judge Jack Hurley of the Tazewell County Circuit Court issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) blocking state and local election officials from moving forward with an April 21 statewide referendum that would let voters decide whether the General Assembly may adopt a new, mid-decade congressional map. The order, sought by the Republican National Committee, the National Republican Congressional Committee, and two GOP members of Congress, is effective until March 18 and could derail the vote because early in-person voting is scheduled to begin March 6. Judge Hurley agreed with the plaintiffs that the referendum’s timing…
Read More
Court Ordered CD11 Redraw in New York Sparks High-Stakes Appeals

Court Ordered CD11 Redraw in New York Sparks High-Stakes Appeals

Status update: Williams et al. v. Board of Elections of the State of New York is now in a fast-moving appellate phase, with the dispute also reaching the U.S. Supreme Court’s emergency docket. On Jan. 21, 2026, a state trial court ruled that New York’s 11th Congressional District (NY-11) violates the New York Constitution’s anti–vote dilution provision (Art. III, § 4(c)(1)) and directed the state’s Independent Redistricting Commission to produce a remedy on a short timetable. Republicans appealed, but an intermediate state appeals court has allowed the case to continue moving toward a redraw, while a sitting member of Congress…
Read More
SCOTUS Denies Emergency Request to Block California Map Over Racial Gerrymandering Claims

SCOTUS Denies Emergency Request to Block California Map Over Racial Gerrymandering Claims

The U.S. Supreme Court has cleared the way for California to implement a new congressional map for the upcoming midterm elections, denying an emergency request from state Republicans to block its use. Enacted through the voter-approved Proposition 50, which passed by a two-to-one margin in November, the plan is projected to help Democrats secure five additional seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. Although the California GOP and the Trump administration argued the map was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, a lower federal court previously ruled that the evidence of racial motivation was "exceptionally weak" compared to the "overwhelming" evidence of…
Read More
New York’s 11th District Struck Down Over Racial Voting Power Concerns

New York’s 11th District Struck Down Over Racial Voting Power Concerns

State Supreme Court Justice Jeffrey Pearlman has invalidated the boundaries of New York’s 11th Congressional District, the city's only Republican-held seat currently represented by Nicole Malliotakis. The ruling determined that the district's current lines unconstitutionally diluted the voting power of Black and Hispanic residents in Staten Island and southern Brooklyn. Citing evidence of a "racially polarized voting bloc" and historical discrimination, the judge ordered the bipartisan Independent Redistricting Commission to submit a new map by February 6. While the commission holds primary authority, past failures to reach consensus have allowed the Democrat-controlled state legislature to intervene and adjust the lines…
Read More
Virginia Mid-Decade Redistricting Update

Virginia Mid-Decade Redistricting Update

Virginia’s mid-decade congressional map effort was halted by a Tazewell County circuit judge who said lawmakers didn’t follow the basic procedural rules for putting a constitutional amendment on the ballot. The state legislature's bid to install a new congressional map by constitutional amendment advanced in late October when the General Assembly, meeting in special session, approved a measure to permit enactment of a mid-decade redistricting congressional map effective for the 2026 mid-term election. A second passage was required in the 2026 session before the map could go to a voter referendum, which was completed on January 16. Republicans in Virginia…
Read More
Court Declines Preliminary Injunction Motion against California’s Prop 50 Congressional Map

Court Declines Preliminary Injunction Motion against California’s Prop 50 Congressional Map

A 3-judge federal court panel has declined to issue a preliminary injunction preventing the use of California's new congressional map in the 2026 elections, which was approved by 64% of voters via Proposition 50 in a November special election. The legal challenge, brought by the California Republican Party and the U.S. Department of Justice, alleged that the map constituted racial gerrymandering by disproportionately favoring Latino voting power. After a three-day preliminary injunction hearing, however, the court rejected these claims in a 2-1 ruling, with the majority opinion concluding that the map was a "political gerrymander" rather than a racially motivated…
Read More
Utah Court Clears the Path for Appellate Review of Congressional Map Decision After No Appeal is Filed

Utah Court Clears the Path for Appellate Review of Congressional Map Decision After No Appeal is Filed

Third District Judge Dianna Gibson has issued a Rule 54(b) certification, specifically granting the Utah Legislature permission to immediately appeal her Aug. 25 ruling to the state Supreme Court. This specific ruling preliminarily voided Utah’s 2021 congressional map and blocked SB200, a law that repealed a 2018 voter-approved initiative (Proposition 4) designed to ban partisan gerrymandering. While Gibson agreed that the public interest is served by a faster resolution, she scolded the Legislature’s attorneys for failing to appeal sooner, noting they offered "no legitimate explanation" for ignoring previous opportunities to challenge her orders over the preceding four months. The outcome…
Read More
Indiana Senate Rejects Mid-Cycle Congressional Map Proposal

Indiana Senate Rejects Mid-Cycle Congressional Map Proposal

The Indiana Republican-led Senate voted down a mid-decade congressional map on Thursday, December 11, 2025, which would have favored the Republican party in the 2026 elections. The map was designed to increase the number of Republican-controlled congressional seats from seven to nine by effectively eliminating Indiana’s two Democratic-held districts by splitting Indianapolis into four districts. The redistricting plan was defeated by a bipartisan majority, with 21 Republican senators joining all 10 Democrats in the chamber to vote against the measure. The vote occurred despite months of intense national pressure, including urging from President Donald Trump to engage in mid-cycle redistricting.…
Read More
Supreme Court Greenlights Texas Congressional Map for 2026

Supreme Court Greenlights Texas Congressional Map for 2026

Texas may use its new congressional plan for the 2026 elections after the Supreme Court granted the state’s emergency stay on Thursday, Dec. 4. In a short, unsigned order, the Court paused a three-judge district court’s Nov. 18 injunction that had barred the 2025 map and directed Texas back to its 2021 lines. Justice Samuel Alito had entered an administrative stay on Nov. 21 while the Court considered the application. The 5-paragraph order says Texas is likely to succeed because the lower court failed to presume legislative good faith and did not draw an adverse inference from the challengers’ failure…
Read More
Redistricting Recap Nov 14 2025: DOJ Joins California Map Lawsuit. Indiana and Kansas Pause Mid-Decade Redistricting. Utah Judge Makes Map Decision

Redistricting Recap Nov 14 2025: DOJ Joins California Map Lawsuit. Indiana and Kansas Pause Mid-Decade Redistricting. Utah Judge Makes Map Decision

Redistricting Developments for the Week of November 10th, 2025. In case you missed it: U.S. Department of Justice Joins Lawsuit to Block California’s New Congressional Map The California Proposition 50 map, approved by state voters on November 4, was crafted to redraw several U.S. House seats in favor of Democrats. The U.S. Department of Justice recently intervened in a lawsuit brought by California Republicans, arguing that the map prioritises race in a way that violates the Constitution and disadvantages certain voters. The case symbolizes the broader national competition over mid-decade redistricting and the high stakes for control of Congress. Indiana…
Read More