Who is Responsible for Redistricting?

Exactly who gets to draw redistricting maps in the states? There are various entities among the states that have responsibility for the task. Some states even have back-up systems in place in case there is no agreement on a map. Here's an overview.

Already know this stuff? Click here for advanced topics.

entities

The short answer to this question is; the state legislature. In regard to congressional districts, Article 1, Sec. 4 of the U.S. Constitution gives states the authority to determine the “times, places and manner of holding [federal] elections.” Congress may override states regarding this, but it has historically declined to do so. In addition, state legislatures have authority over redistricting its own legislative lines unless the state's constitution directs otherwise or if the legislature has delegated that duty to another entity. (“[S]tate legislatures have ‘primary jurisdiction’ over legislative reapportionment.” White v. Weiser, 412 U.S. 783, 795 (1973).

There are various entities that states use to replace the traditional role of the legislature in redistricting, but in most states redistricting remains the province of the legislature. In the past, reform-minded groups have used Iowa as a good example of how politics could be taken out of redistricting, with its use of nonpartisan staff to draw redistricting maps. However, the Iowa legislature retains control over the mapmaking, since the legislature may reject the maps. In Arkansas, the Board of Apportionment is responsible for redrawing the states’ legislative districts. The Board consists of the governor, the secretary of state, and the attorney general.

In the past two decades, commissions have become a popular reform for redistricting however, commissions refer to a large array of redistricting entities, some of which are substantially controlled by the legislature and/or executive branch or have no decision-making power.  Because of this, it is important to distinguish truly “independent” or “citizen” commissions from those entities that are heavily influenced by the legislature. A list of commission websites is here.

Whether commission members are influenced by legislature generally depends on the method of selecting commission members and whether there are restrictions on who may serve on the body. For example, some bipartisan commissions are appointed by legislative leaders and may consist of legislators or other public officials. Independent commissions on the other hand, go through either a randomized or other objective selection process (usually by a nonpartisan entity) and may prohibit members affiliated with the legislature or any public office. It is also important to note that many commissions may only have authority over one map as opposed to both congressional and legislative districts.

To determine to what degree a commission is independent of the legislature, you must consider whether the commission; 1) has exclusive power to enact a map; 2) is comprised of appointed members, or members selected via a nonpartisan process; and 3) excludes candidates affiliated with the legislature, political party officials, individuals who hold or recently held public office, or lobbyists.

Power to Enact a Map

Advisory commissions are just that, they go through the entire process of developing a redistricting map, but it is merely a proposal. The commission has no power to enact the map into law, however, in many cases this type of commission is influential in the outcome of the final map(s). Maine, Utah, and New York currently use this model for both congressional and legislative districts.

Backup Commissions only have power to enact a map if the legislature fails to agree on maps, and in most cases, commission members are appointed by legislators. This type of commission is in operation in Connecticut, Mississippi and Indiana among others.

Commissions with Exclusive Power to Enact a Map: Most states with commissions authorize them to enact redistricting maps. Many of these commissions, while separate entities from the legislature – are influenced by legislators in varying degrees. Indeed, some commissions have legislators as members. In 2011, the New Jersey Apportionment Commission (for state legislative districts) included state legislators.

Member Selection Process

Most commissions in the states are comprised of members appointed by legislative and executive leaders or political party officials. However, a growing trend over the past two redistricting cycles has been to solicit a large swath of the general public to serve as members. In these cases, potential members are vetted for specific skill sets and selected – at least in part, by state officials such as a state auditor or chief state court judge.

Eligibility to Serve

As stated above, some states have very little restrictions on may serve on a redistricting commission, which is why some commissions have members that are legislators. Of the states that do impose restrictions on eligibility, they may prohibit, lobbyists, political party officers, or anyone who has held elected office in the recent past. Some restrictions go on to exclude the family members of ineligible applicants. Generally, the more restrictive eligibility requirements are and the more expansive the member selection process is, the more likely a commission is to be considered “independent.”

Independent Commissions

An independent commission does not have any specific, agreed-upon definition although there is wide agreement that they must have exclusive power to enact a map and have members that are unaffiliated with lobbyists, or party and public officials. Nor can they appointed by the aforementioned individuals. The Arizona and California redistricting commissions meet this threshold for example, and both are widely considered models for independence in redistricting. Arizona established its commission in 2000 and California in 2010. More recently, several states have enacted laws to create independent commissions, including Michigan and Colorado.

More Basics

In-Depth
News & Updates
paradigm-BASICS
Asset 8-8

Redistricting Basics

Here is everything you wanted to know about redistricting but were afraid to ask. Start here ...
Who's responsible for drawing redistricting maps in your state? ...
Gerrymandering is the manipulation of political district boundaries to benefit an identifiable group such as a racial or political group. Some forms of the practice are prohibited by the constitution, state law and other rules ...
Drawing districts to obtain a political advantage is nearly as old as representative government itself. Legal and moral questions abound as the practice becomes pervasive ...
A racial gerrymander is a legal claim under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. It was first recognized by the Supreme Court in the 1993 case Shaw v. Reno ...
Preparing for redistricting has its challenges. It is a process that normally occurs once every ten years and involves many disciplines such including GIS technology, law, and database management ...
In addition to legal requirements, redistricting involves many other operating rules and principles that often conflict ...
The role of race in redistricting ...
Redistricting litigation is common in all fifty states. Here is a review of the constitutional and statutory claims associated with redistricting maps ...
Equal Population among political districts is a constitutional principle that necessitates periodic redrawing of district boundaries - or redistricting ...
The decennial census data and geography supplied by the U.S. Census Bureau is a critical tool for redistricting in the U.S ...
Prisoner reallocation is the process of adjusting the census data used in redistricting so that prisoners are counted at their previous home address as opposed to the prison. ...
Drawing a redistricting map is fraught with controversy. Enacting the official map can be just as challenging. Here's how states make their maps legal ...

Recent Posts

Redistricting Basics