The U.S. Supreme Court has delivered a significant, albeit temporary, reprieve for voting rights advocates and individual litigants, putting on hold a controversial ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit holding that private plaintiffs cannot bring claims under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA), a ruling that could severely limit the ability of individual voters and advocacy groups to sue under the Act. This specific case originated from a challenge to North Dakota’s 2021 state legislative map, which the plaintiffs, two Native American tribes and individual voters, argued diluted Native American voting power by eliminating two districts where they had the ability to elect their own preferred candidates. A federal judge had initially agreed, ordering a new map that led to the election of three Native American legislators in 2024, only for the 8th Circuit to reverse that decision. The Supreme Court’s unsigned order, with Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch dissenting, now pauses the 8th Circuit’s ruling to allow the plaintiffs time to file a petition for review, essentially preserving the status quo and preventing the 2021 map from governing the 2026 election.
This pause is a critical development for policy on redistricting and voting rights. Had the 8th Circuit’s decision been allowed to take effect immediately, it would have fundamentally altered the landscape for challenging potentially discriminatory maps, shifting the burden entirely to the U.S. Department of Justice to bring such cases, or potentially leaving no direct path for affected communities to seek recourse. The ultimate fate of private rights of action under Section 2 remains to be decided, making this case a pivotal one for individuals and communities who seek to challenge redistricting maps.
Find us on:
