One Chicago-Kent College of Law blog likes to predict winners and losers in major supreme court cases by counting the questions during oral argument. According to the blog author’s own statistics, his method is 63% accurate recently – but he says Arizona Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission is nearly a toss up when it comes to the comparative question count. He gives the legislature the upper hand in the end. Read the blog article for his detailed methodology and the actual question counts of the judges.
SCOTUSNow Predicts Winner / Losers in Arizona Redistricting Case by Question Count
On 
Categories : Redistricting Commissions
